Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,308
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $448,049,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul D Lane | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,579,640 |
22 | Freddie P Miller | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,571,536 |
23 | Jet Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,551,009 |
24 | Glenn Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,524,300 |
25 | Mvp Farms Gp | Newton, GA 39870 | $2,491,378 |
26 | Jarrell E Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,478,080 |
27 | Reggie C Bostick | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,464,594 |
28 | Double L Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,401,780 |
29 | Hawthorne Farming Partnership | Doerun, GA 31744 | $2,381,849 |
30 | James Wayne Eubanks | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,375,343 |
31 | Jerome/a G Chason Jr | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,273,497 |
32 | W A Snipes | Baconton, GA 31716 | $2,264,363 |
33 | Yrome Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,252,348 |
34 | Daniel W Connell | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,240,034 |
35 | Donald Eugene Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,236,875 |
36 | Hawthorne Farms Gp | Thomasville, GA 31792 | $2,189,734 |
37 | James W Curles | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,140,252 |
38 | Laney Farms & Growers Inc | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $2,081,203 |
39 | W Hamill Mcnair | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,078,212 |
40 | S M R Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,034,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”