Total Commodity Programs in Mitchell County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,995
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $327,227,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joe E Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,415,287 |
22 | Freddie P Miller | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,398,180 |
23 | Frank B Brooks | Baconton, GA 31716 | $2,371,250 |
24 | Hawthorne Farming Partnership | Doerun, GA 31744 | $2,363,574 |
25 | Reggie C Bostick | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,334,733 |
26 | Glenn Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,327,513 |
27 | Jarrell E Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,266,913 |
28 | Donald Eugene Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,227,904 |
29 | James Wayne Eubanks | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,195,421 |
30 | Yrome Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,192,870 |
31 | Jerome/a G Chason Jr | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,159,707 |
32 | Double L Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,158,002 |
33 | Mvp Farms Gp | Newton, GA 39870 | $2,137,055 |
34 | W Hamill Mcnair | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,072,438 |
35 | Laney Farms & Growers Inc | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $1,980,466 |
36 | Daniel W Connell | Sale City, GA 31784 | $1,979,424 |
37 | Nine Acre Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $1,869,814 |
38 | Hawthorne Farms Gp | Thomasville, GA 31792 | $1,816,054 |
39 | Hawthorne Family Farms | Doerun, GA 31744 | $1,780,806 |
40 | T & S Farms | Sale City, GA 31784 | $1,766,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”