Total Disaster Programs in Peach County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 231
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Peach County, Georgia totaled $14,181,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mason Pecans | Kathleen, GA 31047 | $2,210,867 |
2 | Evans Farms Gp | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $1,633,585 |
3 | Lane Pecan & Vegetables | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $963,278 |
4 | Georgia Pecan Farms L L C | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $767,071 |
5 | Cherokee Pecan Company Inc | Perry, GA 31069 | $575,281 |
6 | Southern Orchard Supply Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $539,082 |
7 | J W Dent & Sons | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $482,628 |
8 | Vinson Farm Lllp | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $472,520 |
9 | 4-g Farms Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $439,620 |
10 | Charles B Evans III | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $322,081 |
11 | Frank Herbert Hiley III | Byron, GA 31008 | $289,756 |
12 | Elizabeth Evans | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $255,290 |
13 | Evans Investment Company | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $219,449 |
14 | Cjc Farms Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $207,235 |
15 | William Grady Shaw | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $202,006 |
16 | C A Vinson And Sons | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $191,052 |
17 | County Line Farm | Culloden, GA 31016 | $185,460 |
18 | Ayer's Farm Inc | Perry, GA 31069 | $172,325 |
19 | Frank Hiley Pecans | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $142,327 |
20 | Stoffell Farms LLC | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $139,317 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>