Conservation Reserve Program in Sumter County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 551
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sumter County, Georgia totaled $21,131,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Providence Plantation Inc | Vienna, GA 31092 | $1,011,715 |
2 | C G & F Farm Gp | Americus, GA 31709 | $531,338 |
3 | Thomas Farms Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $447,643 |
4 | Henry L Crisp | De Soto, GA 31743 | $372,713 |
5 | Grace S Akin | Vienna, GA 31092 | $368,941 |
6 | Carl Roland Satterfield | Americus, GA 31709 | $365,911 |
7 | Ray D Williams | Smithville, GA 31787 | $356,644 |
8 | Robert Emanuel Dodson | Plains, GA 31780 | $349,469 |
9 | Wohlwender Estate Properties LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $340,625 |
10 | Story Family Partnership Lllp | Americus, GA 31709 | $329,860 |
11 | South Georgia Land Co Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $315,385 |
12 | Mary Virginia Crisp | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $295,952 |
13 | Henry A Hart III | Albany, GA 31707 | $294,564 |
14 | Ed Wohlwender Estate | Americus, GA 31709 | $289,578 |
15 | Hodges Land Corporation | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $258,763 |
16 | Carl H Veatch | Americus, GA 31709 | $250,513 |
17 | Irwin C Rutherford | Americus, GA 31709 | $246,662 |
18 | Nika Properties LLC | Vienna, GA 31092 | $221,709 |
19 | Joseph Carl Goodin | Smithville, GA 31787 | $215,773 |
20 | W Randall Short | Plains, GA 31780 | $206,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>