Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Tift County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Tift County, Georgia totaled $1,053,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L Mayo Tucker | Tifton, GA 31794 | $11,434 |
22 | James Eugene Glover | Ty Ty, GA 31795 | $10,384 |
23 | Estate Of Eddie Mae House | Omega, GA 31775 | $10,317 |
24 | Anthony James Goodman | Tifton, GA 31793 | $10,278 |
25 | Stephen Keith Arrington | Tifton, GA 31794 | $10,264 |
26 | Crumley Brothers | Omega, GA 31775 | $9,239 |
27 | Russell Pearman Griffin | Chula, GA 31733 | $8,740 |
28 | Grady Milton Thompson Jr | Tifton, GA 31794 | $8,480 |
29 | Donald Rex Blanchett | Enigma, GA 31749 | $8,468 |
30 | Alan Keith Cawley | Ashburn, GA 31714 | $8,022 |
31 | James Wilton Dillard Jr | Tifton, GA 31793 | $7,371 |
32 | William Sirman Dillard Jr | Ty Ty, GA 31795 | $7,371 |
33 | Danny Carlton Tyson | Tifton, GA 31794 | $7,163 |
34 | Julian Michael Fletcher | Chula, GA 31733 | $6,986 |
35 | James T Phillips Jr | Tifton, GA 31793 | $6,888 |
36 | Dennis Russell Arrington | Tifton, GA 31794 | $6,826 |
37 | Matthew S Wynn | Sycamore, GA 31790 | $6,667 |
38 | Raymond Earl Copeland | Tifton, GA 31794 | $6,651 |
39 | John A Baldwin | Chula, GA 31733 | $6,461 |
40 | John Earl Shannon | Tifton, GA 31793 | $5,953 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”