Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Hawaii, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 228
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Hawaii totaled $3,658,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Barney James Schutte | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $52,481 |
22 | Kaupo Ranch Ltd | Lihue, HI 96766 | $51,671 |
23 | Palekoki Ranch Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $45,443 |
24 | Kelonukai Ranch LLC | Hilo, HI 96720 | $45,191 |
25 | Mauna Kea Moo LLC | Papaikou, HI 96781 | $40,702 |
26 | Kealia Ranch LLC | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $40,689 |
27 | Hoilina Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $38,426 |
28 | Double N Ranch LLC | Volcano, HI 96785 | $37,933 |
29 | Stephen De Luz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $34,081 |
30 | Calvin Riley Louis | Pahala, HI 96777 | $32,101 |
31 | Patrick Daniel Lau | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $31,468 |
32 | Lawrence Costa Jr | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $30,013 |
33 | C & L Ranch Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $28,184 |
34 | Prl English LLC | Kapolei, HI 96709 | $27,558 |
35 | Gomes Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $26,971 |
36 | Jeanette C Kaniho | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $26,878 |
37 | Rj Ranch Llp | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $26,701 |
38 | Onaka Ranch Inc | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $23,526 |
39 | Keane Iranon | Volcano, HI 96785 | $23,303 |
40 | Clarence S. Rapoza | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $21,647 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”