Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Hawaii, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 634
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Hawaii totaled $59,562,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Dean Kaniho | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $178,596 |
82 | Bryant Jerome Azevedo | Hilo, HI 96720 | $176,817 |
83 | Jo Anne Boteilho Branco | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $174,632 |
84 | Kilauea Cattle Company Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $173,293 |
85 | , | $168,047 | |
86 | Jill J Mattos | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $165,505 |
87 | Ronsten Padover Andrade Jr | Keaau, HI 96749 | $164,833 |
88 | Godfrey K Kainoa Sr | Hawi, HI 96719 | $162,517 |
89 | Charles Tatsuo Onaka | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $161,060 |
90 | A Decoite Ranch LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $158,175 |
91 | Kelvin Cardoza | Laupahoehoe, HI 96764 | $155,848 |
92 | Richard W Kaniho | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $153,858 |
93 | Island Dairy Inc | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $152,345 |
94 | Richard Clarence French | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $150,149 |
95 | April Alohalani Wana | Hilo, HI 96720 | $147,668 |
96 | Henry Gibson Dba Rocker G Livestock | Waimanalo, HI 96795 | $146,500 |
97 | Paradise Ranch LLC | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $144,519 |
98 | Stanley Boteilho | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $144,518 |
99 | Ada Inc | Honolulu, HI 96822 | $143,542 |
100 | Franklin Boteilho | Kailua Kona, HI 96740 | $143,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”