Total Commodity Programs in Hawaii County, Hawaii, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 412
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hawaii County, Hawaii totaled $1,367,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Puna Chocolate Company | Hilo, HI 96720 | $13,859 |
22 | Elmer S Pitpit | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $13,749 |
23 | Jurahame A Garcia Leyva - Orchidf | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $13,315 |
24 | Kona Controls Inc Dba Makapueo Farms | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $13,047 |
25 | Orchid Plantation Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $13,044 |
26 | Orlando Manuel | Keaau, HI 96749 | $12,767 |
27 | Agee Inc | Ninole, HI 96773 | $12,198 |
28 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $11,875 |
29 | Hokukano Ranch Inc | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $11,875 |
30 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $11,847 |
31 | Alfred Galimba | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $11,513 |
32 | Gregory J K Garcia Sr | Glide, OR 97443 | $10,837 |
33 | Panfilo C Andres | Keaau, HI 96749 | $10,297 |
34 | Bryant Jerome Azevedo | Hilo, HI 96720 | $9,497 |
35 | Lions Gate Inc | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $9,466 |
36 | Emily Jo Taaroa | Keaau, HI 96749 | $9,155 |
37 | Volcano Island Honey Co LLC Dba Rare Hawaiian Hone | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $8,954 |
38 | Crown Pacific International | Hilo, HI 96720 | $8,954 |
39 | Darcy David Nobriga | Laupahoehoe, HI 96764 | $8,892 |
40 | David Quoc Huynh | Pepeekeo, HI 96783 | $8,812 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”