Total Disaster Programs in Maui County, Hawaii, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 335
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Maui County, Hawaii totaled $17,829,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | A Decoite Ranch LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $184,115 |
22 | Edmund Pedro | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $174,948 |
23 | Dennis Kamakana Sr | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $157,516 |
24 | Charles Kahaleauki Jr | Kaupo, HI 96713 | $144,683 |
25 | Ricky Rikio Kametani | Kula, HI 96790 | $143,881 |
26 | Helen Harriet Santos | Haiku, HI 96708 | $142,486 |
27 | Allan J Mendes Sr | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $130,988 |
28 | Justin Haloa Masami Teixeira | Makawao, HI 96768 | $120,328 |
29 | Chauncy Monden | Kula, HI 96790 | $114,446 |
30 | Charles Ota | Kahului, HI 96732 | $110,339 |
31 | Kualapuu Cattle Company LLC | Kailua, HI 96734 | $109,335 |
32 | Thompson Ranch & Riding Stables LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $106,762 |
33 | Molokai Homestead Livestock Assoc | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $106,158 |
34 | Fe Traje Farm LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $103,613 |
35 | Lopes Farm LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $93,206 |
36 | Larry G Alexander | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $93,163 |
37 | Paul Anthony Lopes | Haiku, HI 96708 | $92,755 |
38 | Cabrals Ranch LLC | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $87,218 |
39 | Donald H Decoite | Makawao, HI 96768 | $86,345 |
40 | Robert Ito Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $79,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”