Farm Subsidy information
Maui County, Hawaii
Total Subsidies in Maui County, Hawaii, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 451
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maui County, Hawaii totaled $20,405,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James C Sakugawa & Sons | Kula, HI 96790 | $1,619,979 |
2 | Brendan L Balthazar | Makawao, HI 96768 | $1,423,767 |
3 | Kula Country Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $1,185,776 |
4 | Kaupo Ranch Ltd | Lihue, HI 96766 | $1,029,173 |
5 | Lanai Institute For The Environm | Lanai City, HI 96763 | $763,871 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $553,731 |
7 | Haleakala Ranch Company | Makawao, HI 96768 | $454,515 |
8 | Loe Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $450,119 |
9 | Pohakuloa Ranch | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $447,334 |
10 | Diamond B Ranch LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $417,287 |
11 | M&m Five Star Cattle LLC | Escalon, CA 95320 | $381,500 |
12 | Nobrigas Ranch Inc | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $327,828 |
13 | Pacific Produce Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $323,389 |
14 | Howards Nurseries Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $314,819 |
15 | William Gerard Jacintho | Kula, HI 96790 | $285,732 |
16 | Bryan Takeshi Otani | Makawao, HI 96768 | $281,481 |
17 | Ada Inc | Honolulu, HI 96822 | $269,970 |
18 | Ulupalakua Ranch Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $242,375 |
19 | Noel Escobedo Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $240,296 |
20 | Richard Clarence French | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $234,212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>