Conservation Reserve Program in Bannock County, Idaho, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 95
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $2,443,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Christine Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $15,793 |
22 | Lamar Armstrong Revocable Trust | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $15,265 |
23 | Arkansas Ranches | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $14,845 |
24 | Angelo Trayis Sr Trust | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $14,302 |
25 | Robert E Vaughan | Inkom, ID 83245 | $12,807 |
26 | Mike D Yantis | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $12,511 |
27 | Darren R Howe | Downey, ID 83234 | $12,392 |
28 | Circle E Ranch, LLC | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $12,138 |
29 | Marshall Ogden | Clayton, ID 83227 | $12,081 |
30 | Kent Jensen | Downey, ID 83234 | $11,773 |
31 | , | $11,385 | |
32 | Launa Maynard | Shelley, ID 83274 | $11,156 |
33 | Nancy Armstrong | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $10,728 |
34 | Betty Jane Gambles Family Trust | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $10,682 |
35 | Mary Anna Hendron Trust | N Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $10,408 |
36 | , | $10,296 | |
37 | , | $10,277 | |
38 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $9,742 |
39 | Matthew Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $9,475 |
40 | Thomas Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $9,475 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”