Conservation Reserve Program in Bannock County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 124
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $2,767,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard & Raida Jensen Family Trust | Caldwell, ID 83605 | $9,278 |
42 | Aspen Hollow LLC | Downey, ID 83234 | $8,984 |
43 | Wendell Marley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $8,839 |
44 | H Bruce Green | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $8,753 |
45 | Kevin Ardean Higbee | Downey, ID 83234 | $8,453 |
46 | Doreen Curtis | St George, UT 84770 | $8,424 |
47 | Merrill Ranch Inc | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $8,286 |
48 | Kenneth L Colling | Inkom, ID 83245 | $8,010 |
49 | Arlene Colling | Inkom, ID 83245 | $8,010 |
50 | Joyce Terry | Iona, ID 83427 | $7,978 |
51 | Brent Terry | Iona, ID 83427 | $7,978 |
52 | Matthew Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $7,562 |
53 | Thomas Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $7,562 |
54 | Jacob Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $7,562 |
55 | Gregory Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $7,562 |
56 | Gregory M Williams | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $7,502 |
57 | Ronald Jolley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $7,367 |
58 | Angelo Trayis Sr Trust | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $7,330 |
59 | Paul A Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $7,211 |
60 | Teri Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $7,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”