Loan Deficiency in Bannock County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 216
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $2,400,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ronald Salvesen | Downey, ID 83234 | $1,088 |
142 | William T Evans | Downey, ID 83234 | $1,060 |
143 | Wilson D Tippets | Arimo, ID 83214 | $1,044 |
144 | Double A Land & Livestock | Chubbuck, ID 83202 | $1,042 |
145 | Allen Brady | Downey, ID 83234 | $1,035 |
146 | Hazel Bolingbroke | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $1,020 |
147 | Pratt Brothers | Downey, ID 83234 | $998 |
148 | Tebbin Salvesen | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $997 |
149 | Ronnie Tillotson | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $967 |
150 | Grant B Egley | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $936 |
151 | Debi Swanson | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $903 |
152 | Jim Hart | Chubbuck, ID 83202 | $884 |
153 | H Pierce Bilyeu | Boise, ID 83709 | $882 |
154 | Betty Thompson | Logan, UT 84341 | $877 |
155 | Berniece Tarbet | Arimo, ID 83214 | $858 |
156 | William Kuttler | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $817 |
157 | Gordon Salvesen | Downey, ID 83234 | $791 |
158 | Ronald Jolley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $786 |
159 | Gene Fagnant | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $779 |
160 | Ruth Ann Olson | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”