Farm Subsidy information
Bannock County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Bannock County, Idaho, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 375
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $5,356,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $1,356,762 |
| 2 | Mcnabb Farms | Inkom, ID 83245 | $176,825 |
| 3 | Ann Horrocks Loveland | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $85,486 |
| 4 | Kevin Loveland | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $85,486 |
| 5 | Shoshone Bannock Agri-business Corporation | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $78,893 |
| 6 | Hartvigsen Brothers | Centerville, UT 84014 | $72,374 |
| 7 | Michael W Vaughan | Downey, ID 83234 | $59,830 |
| 8 | Bradley C Kent | Arimo, ID 83214 | $59,130 |
| 9 | Worlton Farms LLC | Arimo, ID 83214 | $54,461 |
| 10 | Elmer H Stanger | Inkom, ID 83245 | $53,279 |
| 11 | Mckee Family Ranch LLC | Inkom, ID 83245 | $51,170 |
| 12 | Koester Farms Inc | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $50,000 |
| 13 | Sheldon Hatley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $45,792 |
| 14 | Ralph Wheatley | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $41,315 |
| 15 | Lori A Kent | Arimo, ID 83214 | $39,402 |
| 16 | Linda Burnham | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $38,457 |
| 17 | Merrill Ranch Inc | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $38,445 |
| 18 | Koester Brothers Investment | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $37,870 |
| 19 | Broken Bar Land And Cattle LLC | Mccammon, ID 83250 | $37,556 |
| 20 | Arimo Corporation | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $36,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf