Farm Subsidy information
Bannock County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Bannock County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,268
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $138,812,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David Burnham | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $740,478 |
22 | Vance Burrup | Inkom, ID 83245 | $738,219 |
23 | Morgan Evans | Downey, ID 83234 | $710,709 |
24 | Grant Olson | Arimo, ID 83214 | $703,974 |
25 | Arkansas Ranches | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $684,612 |
26 | Paul Hatch | Downey, ID 83234 | $675,415 |
27 | Cedar Mountain Farms | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $664,965 |
28 | The Land Holdings Group LLC | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $635,633 |
29 | Mark Loveland | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $634,763 |
30 | Ronald J Capell Estate | West Jordan, UT 84084 | $619,359 |
31 | Ron Swanson | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $602,956 |
32 | Randy Gneiting | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $596,848 |
33 | Lamar Armstrong Revocable Trust | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $581,180 |
34 | Angelo Trayis Sr Trust | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $575,501 |
35 | Susan Loveland | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $574,312 |
36 | Craig Criddle | Downey, ID 83234 | $563,987 |
37 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $563,987 |
38 | Linda Burnham | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $558,819 |
39 | Bradley C Kent | Arimo, ID 83214 | $556,271 |
40 | Sheldon Hatley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $551,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”