Farm Subsidy information
Bannock County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Bannock County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 226
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $6,632,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $1,346,595 |
2 | S & M Honey | Downey, ID 83234 | $303,886 |
3 | Egan Ranch LLC | Arimo, ID 83214 | $140,852 |
4 | Hartvigsen Brothers | Centerville, UT 84014 | $139,377 |
5 | Mcnabb Farms | Inkom, ID 83245 | $121,971 |
6 | Meadow Haven Inc. | Arimo, ID 83214 | $107,727 |
7 | Todd Mickelsen | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $107,513 |
8 | Kurt And Amy Neff Joint Venture | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $90,582 |
9 | Wh Land & Livestock | Inkom, ID 83245 | $81,258 |
10 | Michael W Vaughan | Downey, ID 83234 | $74,616 |
11 | Nf Davis Ranch LLC | Downey, ID 83234 | $73,544 |
12 | Elmer H Stanger | Inkom, ID 83245 | $72,050 |
13 | , | $69,818 | |
14 | Marsha Lish | Arimo, ID 83214 | $68,685 |
15 | Lone Pine Ranch Inc | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $61,132 |
16 | Timothy L Losee | Downey, ID 83234 | $60,868 |
17 | Paul A Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $60,864 |
18 | Sheldon Hatley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $56,934 |
19 | Jeff Eddington | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $55,754 |
20 | Shoshone Bannock Agri-business Corporation | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $53,950 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>