Total Emergency Relief Program in Bannock County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcnabb Farms | Inkom, ID 83245 | $121,971 |
2 | Lone Pine Ranch Inc | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $70,302 |
3 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,042 |
4 | Kevin Koester | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $23,120 |
5 | Michael W Vaughan | Downey, ID 83234 | $18,961 |
6 | Merrill Ranch Inc | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $16,328 |
7 | Rick Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $16,313 |
8 | Brett Casperson | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $15,290 |
9 | M & S Ranch LLC | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $14,741 |
10 | Jeromey Stanger | Inkom, ID 83245 | $14,340 |
11 | Fish Creek Farms Inc | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $13,515 |
12 | Shoshone Bannock Agri-business Corporation | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $12,873 |
13 | Grant Olson | Arimo, ID 83214 | $11,917 |
14 | Monte Henderson | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $7,583 |
15 | Tyson Koester | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $7,267 |
16 | Arkansas Ranches | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $6,461 |
17 | Avery Ranch | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $6,428 |
18 | Wendell Marley | Arimo, ID 83214 | $4,653 |
19 | Scott Henderson | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $3,677 |
20 | Timothy L Losee | Downey, ID 83234 | $3,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>