Farm Subsidy information
Bear Lake County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Bear Lake County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,009
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bear Lake County, Idaho totaled $71,515,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Nelson | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $549,128 |
22 | Max Bunderson | Paris, ID 83261 | $546,073 |
23 | Rdu Investments Lc | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $543,214 |
24 | Emma Lyle Boehme | Geneva, ID 83238 | $520,701 |
25 | State Of Utah-trust Lands Adminis | Richfield, UT 84701 | $517,609 |
26 | Drue B Smith | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $505,407 |
27 | Deloy W Romrell | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $503,923 |
28 | Jed Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $494,949 |
29 | Brad Transtrum | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $476,800 |
30 | Treygen Nelson | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $473,463 |
31 | J Kent Alleman | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $447,383 |
32 | Bear Lake Ranch LLC | Morgan, UT 84050 | $434,280 |
33 | Don L Crane | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $429,879 |
34 | Edward W Kunz | Bern, ID 83220 | $395,592 |
35 | Garth Alleman | Bern, ID 83220 | $387,692 |
36 | Val Keetch | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $374,023 |
37 | Stuart Crane | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $363,439 |
38 | Scott Nelson | Paris, ID 83261 | $345,687 |
39 | John Cannon | Woodland Hills, CA 91364 | $341,625 |
40 | Keene Rigby | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $330,521 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”