Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Bear Lake County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 86
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Bear Lake County, Idaho totaled $671,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | 3 Mile Dairy Incorporated | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $3,759 |
42 | Cooper Jensen | Ovid, ID 83254 | $3,303 |
43 | Ross William Israelsen | Wellsville, UT 84339 | $3,255 |
44 | Glenn Transtrum | Saint Charles, ID 83272 | $2,841 |
45 | Elquist Ranches Inc | Hansen, ID 83334 | $2,841 |
46 | William Blair Robison | Dingle, ID 83233 | $2,724 |
47 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $2,525 |
48 | Payne Livestock LLC | Cokeville, WY 83114 | $2,417 |
49 | Wynden Dean Ward | Ovid, ID 83254 | $2,394 |
50 | Kent Carlsen | Providence, UT 84332 | $2,301 |
51 | Dallas H & Theresa M Arnell Ranch LLC | Saint Charles, ID 83272 | $2,300 |
52 | Mark Ipsen | Dingle, ID 83233 | $2,250 |
53 | Edward W Kunz | Bern, ID 83220 | $2,235 |
54 | Elkhorn Ranch LLC | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $2,208 |
55 | Lee Ann Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $2,192 |
56 | , | $2,106 | |
57 | Mike Robison | Dingle, ID 83233 | $2,028 |
58 | Roy A Bunderson | Bloomington, ID 83223 | $1,899 |
59 | Don L Crane | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $1,851 |
60 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $1,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”