Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Bear Lake County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 86
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Bear Lake County, Idaho totaled $671,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fred Hunzeker & Sons | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $107,727 |
2 | Keetch 61 Ranch LLC | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $55,188 |
3 | Eight Mile Ranch LLC | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $40,632 |
4 | Weston Angus Ranch | Laketown, UT 84038 | $25,635 |
5 | Ward Bros Dairy | Bloomington, ID 83223 | $23,460 |
6 | Max Bunderson | Paris, ID 83261 | $22,029 |
7 | , | $18,744 | |
8 | Half Circle Ranch, LLC | Geneva, ID 83238 | $18,507 |
9 | Jason K. Olson | St. Charles, ID 83272 | $18,351 |
10 | Wine Cup Cattle Co Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $16,836 |
11 | Wine Cup Land And Livestock LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $16,164 |
12 | Sean Z Bartschi | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $15,858 |
13 | J Kent Alleman | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $14,410 |
14 | Diamond Heart Cattle Company LLC | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $14,327 |
15 | Kerry Romrell | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $14,018 |
16 | Ben Weston | Randolph, UT 84064 | $13,134 |
17 | Phillip D Bartschi | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $12,399 |
18 | Kim Clark | Cokeville, WY 83114 | $12,291 |
19 | Lynn C Keetch | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $11,928 |
20 | Bryce Crane | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $11,898 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>