Farm Subsidy information
Benewah County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Benewah County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,441
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Benewah County, Idaho totaled $79,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hillary Lawson | Plummer, ID 83851 | $737,210 |
22 | Don Bruce Family Farms Ltd Prtshp | La Conner, WA 98257 | $727,139 |
23 | Skyline Land & Livestock LLC | Desmet, ID 83824 | $652,299 |
24 | Haas Farms LLC | St Maries, ID 83861 | $651,925 |
25 | Barbara Leigh Haeg | Worley, ID 83876 | $629,973 |
26 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $628,728 |
27 | Fletcher Farms Inc | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $606,564 |
28 | David Duncan | Worley, ID 83876 | $565,579 |
29 | Joe P Sievers | Plummer, ID 83851 | $563,790 |
30 | Kelly Rambo | Farmington, WA 99128 | $518,962 |
31 | Ford Gumm & Sons Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $482,436 |
32 | Valhalla Farms Inc | Plummer, ID 83851 | $481,821 |
33 | J & S Haas Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $452,684 |
34 | Philip R Lampert | Plummer, ID 83851 | $441,779 |
35 | Denny Bros LLC | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $433,934 |
36 | Catherine J Morris | Worley, ID 83876 | $432,352 |
37 | Coeur D'alene Tribe | Plummer, ID 83851 | $427,324 |
38 | Millhorn Farm Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $391,853 |
39 | Dan E Hay | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $383,153 |
40 | Potlatch Land And Lumber LLC | Warren, AR 71671 | $381,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”