Production Flexibility Program in Camas County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 256
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Camas County, Idaho totaled $2,271,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Brian Miller Estate | Twin Falls, ID 83303 | $3,715 |
102 | Donald L Schiermeier | Bruneau, ID 83604 | $3,700 |
103 | Ellsworth Weatherly | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $3,430 |
104 | State Of Idaho | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $3,230 |
105 | Willard Wilson | Sun City, AZ 85351 | $3,195 |
106 | Royal Fork Restaurant Corp | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $3,121 |
107 | Everett Trader | Gooding, ID 83330 | $3,079 |
108 | Mike Funkhouser | Glenns Ferry, ID 83623 | $2,949 |
109 | John L Gaskill | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $2,901 |
110 | Joe L Steffens | Hansen, ID 83334 | $2,761 |
111 | Lois Scruggs | Boise, ID 83704 | $2,712 |
112 | Colleen Loucks | Tigard, OR 97223 | $2,686 |
113 | T T Wokersien | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $2,632 |
114 | Half Moon LLC | Boise, ID 83704 | $2,555 |
115 | Mitchell B Schmidt | Gooding, ID 83330 | $2,552 |
116 | Mary Holladay | Payette, ID 83661 | $2,494 |
117 | Gerald Metzler | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $2,462 |
118 | James J Thornton Trust | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $2,431 |
119 | Minnie Thornton | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $2,430 |
120 | Kenneth Backstrom | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $2,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”