Farm Subsidy information
Camas County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Camas County, Idaho, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Camas County, Idaho totaled $2,329,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David E Coates | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $26,630 |
22 | Jerry M Giese | Boise, ID 83702 | $23,871 |
23 | Patterson Land And Livestock Company Inc | Gooding, ID 83330 | $23,111 |
24 | Delbert Mcmurdo Jr | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $22,910 |
25 | Harness Farms LLC | Mt Home, ID 83647 | $21,892 |
26 | Gordon Schmidt Dba Bar H Bar Ranch | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $21,669 |
27 | William A Simon | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $21,067 |
28 | Max Wilson | Corral, ID 83322 | $20,037 |
29 | Joshua Robert Ivie | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $19,215 |
30 | Gary L Reagan | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $19,141 |
31 | Wolf Springs Ranch | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $19,116 |
32 | Frostenson Farms | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $18,684 |
33 | Caven Real Estate Services LLC | Eagle, ID 83616 | $17,681 |
34 | Soldier Creek Ventures LLC | Boise, ID 83713 | $17,389 |
35 | Frank R Wolf | Boise, ID 83709 | $17,110 |
36 | Toone Land & Livestock Inc | Gooding, ID 83330 | $15,744 |
37 | Leroy Trader | Gooding, ID 83330 | $15,328 |
38 | Jimmy D Kramer | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $13,946 |
39 | Selby Crossing LLC | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $13,661 |
40 | Robert Jim Ivie | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $13,185 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”