Farm Subsidy information
Caribou County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Caribou County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,154
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caribou County, Idaho totaled $185,439,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Darwin Josephson | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $783,320 |
42 | Jerry Kim Welch | Grace, ID 83241 | $760,595 |
43 | Rulon F Wistisen | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $738,377 |
44 | Don Ayers | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $730,070 |
45 | Neibaur Farm Enterprises | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $723,016 |
46 | Date G Yost | West Jordan, UT 84081 | $711,656 |
47 | Tbs Farms Inc | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $703,444 |
48 | Max D Rigby | Logan, UT 84321 | $694,716 |
49 | Beverly Wight | Grace, ID 83241 | $693,540 |
50 | Gilbert Farms, L.l.c. | Grace, ID 83241 | $668,993 |
51 | Edries N Hansen Properties LLC | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $668,125 |
52 | Lakey Brothers Ptn | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $655,883 |
53 | Samuel Curtis Reed | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $651,056 |
54 | Etcheverry Sheep Co | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $649,638 |
55 | C V Cattle Co Inc | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $644,874 |
56 | E Mark Wells | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $639,167 |
57 | Cellan Farms Inc | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $634,944 |
58 | Torgesen And Sons Inc | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $627,613 |
59 | Crandall Farms Inc | Springville, UT 84663 | $626,418 |
60 | M Wells Properties L L C | Corinne, UT 84307 | $626,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”