Farm Subsidy information
Cassia County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Cassia County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,671
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cassia County, Idaho totaled $402,864,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Antelope Hills Inc | Burley, ID 83318 | $2,415,660 |
22 | Steve C Wybenga | Burley, ID 83318 | $2,330,244 |
23 | Heglar Creek Dairy LLC | Declo, ID 83323 | $2,293,396 |
24 | Moo Mountain Milk | Burley, ID 83318 | $2,120,047 |
25 | Hardy Farms Inc | Oakley, ID 83346 | $2,113,559 |
26 | Heglar Creek Farms | Declo, ID 83323 | $2,019,064 |
27 | Turner Farms | Declo, ID 83323 | $1,993,712 |
28 | Zollinger Cattle Co | Malta, ID 83342 | $1,974,619 |
29 | East Ridge Milk LLC | Jackson, ID 83350 | $1,970,446 |
30 | Lazy Dj Partnership | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,959,448 |
31 | Solar Farms | Rupert, ID 83350 | $1,942,808 |
32 | Moss Farms Operations LLC | Rupert, ID 83350 | $1,928,073 |
33 | Acme Dairy Inc | Oakley, ID 83346 | $1,883,491 |
34 | Mark T Newcomb | Rupert, ID 83350 | $1,883,468 |
35 | Lonna Newcomb | Rupert, ID 83350 | $1,835,063 |
36 | Harper Family Partnership | Declo, ID 83323 | $1,832,076 |
37 | Oak Valley Dairy LLC | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,793,918 |
38 | Jones & Widerberg | West Jordan, UT 84088 | $1,787,523 |
39 | Circle Farms | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,749,504 |
40 | Craig S Larson | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,679,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”