Total Conservation Programs in Elmore County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Elmore County, Idaho totaled $4,692,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Walter L Trail | King Hill, ID 83633 | $67,626 |
22 | M Peter Nielsen | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $66,189 |
23 | Squaw Creek Farms LLC | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $54,813 |
24 | Michael F Reynolds | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $54,647 |
25 | Clare Olson | Hill City, ID 83337 | $54,621 |
26 | Farm Development Corp | Boise, ID 83701 | $51,495 |
27 | Malcomson Ranch | Gooding, ID 83330 | $45,900 |
28 | Camas Cattle | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $45,840 |
29 | Double Anchor Ranches Inc | Glenns Ferry, ID 83623 | $45,723 |
30 | Floyd Venable | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $44,605 |
31 | Stewart Land & Cattle Inc | Eagle, ID 83616 | $43,850 |
32 | E & H Farms Inc. | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $41,696 |
33 | Allen T Noble | Boise, ID 83701 | $39,390 |
34 | Holstein Heifer Ranch Inc. | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $35,295 |
35 | Lynn E Johnson | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $34,854 |
36 | Allen Thompson | King Hill, ID 83633 | $34,508 |
37 | Philip Tait | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $32,126 |
38 | Terry Ketterling | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $31,800 |
39 | Linda Ketterling | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $31,800 |
40 | Betty Lou Kent | Mountain Home, ID 83647 | $31,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”