Total Conservation Programs in Fremont County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 536
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fremont County, Idaho totaled $36,989,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Forrest/louise Howell Trust | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $60,580 |
142 | Tom Markland | Boise, ID 83704 | $59,736 |
143 | Ice Tong Land And Cattle Co LLC | Sedalia, CO 80135 | $59,191 |
144 | Michael F Grube | Ashton, ID 83420 | $58,575 |
145 | Merlin Jenkins | Ashton, ID 83420 | $58,499 |
146 | Seeley Farms LLC | Ashton, ID 83420 | $58,339 |
147 | Larry Singleton | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $58,197 |
148 | Jeffrey Niendorf | Rigby, ID 83442 | $57,960 |
149 | C Brent Harshbarger | Ashton, ID 83420 | $57,784 |
150 | Harvey Williams | Ashton, ID 83420 | $56,810 |
151 | Gmc Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $56,607 |
152 | Paul Romrell | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $56,439 |
153 | Mary Nedrow | Ashton, ID 83420 | $56,262 |
154 | Bradley Bauer | Sugar City, ID 83448 | $55,974 |
155 | Joel And Ileen Brown Family Limit | Bountiful, UT 84010 | $55,519 |
156 | Michelle Ashley | Frederick, MD 21702 | $55,315 |
157 | Vance E Blanchard | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $55,243 |
158 | Roy Stegelmeier | Ashton, ID 83420 | $55,099 |
159 | Fred C Hertwig | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $54,711 |
160 | Wm L Miller | Ashton, ID 83420 | $54,509 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”