Farm Subsidy information
Fremont County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Fremont County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,594
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fremont County, Idaho totaled $203,490,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hughes Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $1,134,970 |
22 | R T Kandler LLC | Idaho Falls, ID 83405 | $1,102,050 |
23 | 5c Farms LLC | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $1,080,369 |
24 | Beard Farms | Tetonia, ID 83452 | $1,073,552 |
25 | R H Hawkes And Sons Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $1,068,403 |
26 | Harshbarger Farms Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $1,066,316 |
27 | C & L Ranch LLC | Ashton, ID 83420 | $1,056,827 |
28 | Curtis Parkinson | Ashton, ID 83420 | $1,036,198 |
29 | Dan Reynolds | Ashton, ID 83420 | $1,026,614 |
30 | Keith Blanchard | Chester, ID 83421 | $973,512 |
31 | Hawkes Management Corporation | Ashton, ID 83420 | $967,855 |
32 | Kip O Martindale | Ashton, ID 83420 | $948,980 |
33 | Paul Cherry Farms Part | Bozeman, MT 59719 | $947,571 |
34 | Raybould Brothers Farms LLC | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $908,932 |
35 | Crapo Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $890,674 |
36 | Steinman Farms Partnership | Ashton, ID 83420 | $883,933 |
37 | Crapo Brothers | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $875,305 |
38 | Dennis Rogers | Ashton, ID 83420 | $864,112 |
39 | Kent Rogers | Ashton, ID 83420 | $856,870 |
40 | K C Henry | Laurel, MT 59044 | $842,086 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”