Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Idaho County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 246
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Idaho County, Idaho totaled $2,825,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $35,858 | |
22 | Douglas H Boggan | Riggins, ID 83549 | $35,486 |
23 | Tate Randall Stowers | White Bird, ID 83554 | $35,303 |
24 | Skookumchuck Ranch Ltd Co | White Bird, ID 83554 | $33,131 |
25 | Ray Holes Dba Lazy H Livestock | Grangeville, ID 83530 | $29,707 |
26 | Jason Klement | Grangeville, ID 83530 | $28,184 |
27 | Darrel Newman | Stites, ID 83552 | $27,953 |
28 | Rad Farm & Chemical Inc | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $26,507 |
29 | Vernon Davis | Kooskia, ID 83539 | $24,876 |
30 | Robert Enneking | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $24,725 |
31 | Marilyn M Rylaarsdam-schoo | Grangeville, ID 83530 | $22,499 |
32 | Clinton E Mader | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $22,451 |
33 | Konnyr T Marek | Riggins, ID 83549 | $21,757 |
34 | Jack Gehring | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $21,069 |
35 | Stanley Hendren | Kooskia, ID 83539 | $20,747 |
36 | 5a Cattle LLC | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $19,229 |
37 | Gerry Gehring | Keuterville, ID 83522 | $19,149 |
38 | Carl Deford | Grangeville, ID 83530 | $18,524 |
39 | James Marek | White Bird, ID 83554 | $17,801 |
40 | Dominic J Lustig | Kamiah, ID 83536 | $16,894 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”