Farm Subsidy information
Jefferson County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Jefferson County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,515
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jefferson County, Idaho totaled $192,451,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Nelson Dairy LLC | Rigby, ID 83442 | $415,022 |
82 | Northwind Farms LLC | Shelley, ID 83274 | $412,298 |
83 | Nukaya Farms Inc | Roberts, ID 83444 | $408,453 |
84 | Birch Creek Ranches LLC | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $401,347 |
85 | Burleigh Tomchak | Roberts, ID 83444 | $395,105 |
86 | Wooden B Inc | Terreton, ID 83450 | $393,959 |
87 | Call Farms Jt Vent | Rigby, ID 83442 | $390,092 |
88 | Dallas Raymond & Sons | Menan, ID 83434 | $384,389 |
89 | Lakeside Farms LLC | Terreton, ID 83450 | $384,386 |
90 | Kirt Hansen Farms Inc | Monteview, ID 83435 | $383,739 |
91 | Glenn F Zweifel | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $381,134 |
92 | Charles B Wells | Roberts, ID 83444 | $378,801 |
93 | Jeff B Evans | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $377,631 |
94 | Douglas D Farnsworth | Rigby, ID 83442 | $376,855 |
95 | George E Ellsworth Sole Proprietor | Lewisville, ID 83431 | $371,185 |
96 | Brent Dalling | Hamer, ID 83425 | $366,460 |
97 | Blue Stem Ranches Jt Vent | Roberts, ID 83444 | $361,108 |
98 | Allan R Shupe | Hamer, ID 83425 | $359,708 |
99 | Dobson Ranches Inc | Hamer, ID 83425 | $354,811 |
100 | R J Ball Farms And Monte Vista Fa | Monteview, ID 83435 | $353,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”