Production Flexibility Program in Kootenai County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 250
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Kootenai County, Idaho totaled $5,137,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bla Bar Inc | Athol, ID 83801 | $33,743 |
42 | Terry Jacklin | Kingston, WA 98346 | $32,439 |
43 | Terry Nichols | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $30,168 |
44 | Todd Earl Wright | Spokane, WA 99206 | $29,525 |
45 | Robert N Turnipseed | Hayden Lake, ID 83835 | $29,467 |
46 | Faye Schultz | Spokane Valley, WA 99016 | $28,464 |
47 | Jacklin Land Company | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $28,162 |
48 | Henderson Partnership | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $24,392 |
49 | Kootenai Properties Inc | Bear Valley Springs, CA 93561 | $23,855 |
50 | Lisa Meyer | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $23,519 |
51 | East Point Farms | Sandpoint, ID 83864 | $22,879 |
52 | Earl Clausen Farm Inc | Waverly, WA 99039 | $22,368 |
53 | Donald Beck | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $19,559 |
54 | Paul Stearns | Apache Junction, AZ 85119 | $19,316 |
55 | Richard Waller | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $19,078 |
56 | C Earl Wright | Veradale, WA 99037 | $18,528 |
57 | Double F Ranch Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $18,287 |
58 | Donald W Nyrop | Minneapolis, MN 55424 | $18,009 |
59 | Steve Kerns | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $17,802 |
60 | Otto & Hattie Dagefoerde Trust C | Spokane, WA 99220 | $17,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”