Production Flexibility Program in Kootenai County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 250
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Kootenai County, Idaho totaled $5,137,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | E C Morlan | Spokane, WA 99203 | $80,169 |
22 | Jeff Bloomsburg | Worley, ID 83876 | $78,377 |
23 | Chris E Ramsey | Rockford, WA 99030 | $73,626 |
24 | Larry Howell Sr | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $69,881 |
25 | Lampert Farm And Ranch Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $68,606 |
26 | Rock Creek Land Company | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $68,476 |
27 | Jacquot Farm Ent | Hayden, ID 83835 | $66,674 |
28 | Bill Dole | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $65,952 |
29 | Warren Dole | Irrigon, OR 97844 | $65,936 |
30 | Michael Dole | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $65,931 |
31 | Walter Meyer | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $65,190 |
32 | Wallace Meyer | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $64,185 |
33 | Jim Fischer | Rockford, WA 99030 | $62,742 |
34 | E O Ness Inc | Spokane Valley, WA 99206 | $58,608 |
35 | Bodine Farm | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $57,740 |
36 | Wayne R Meyer | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $53,381 |
37 | Audrey Bitter Jackson | Spokane, WA 99203 | $43,511 |
38 | Dale Rew | Spokane, WA 99223 | $38,119 |
39 | Thomas R Rohde | Athol, ID 83801 | $36,710 |
40 | Francis L Porterfield | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $34,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”