Total Emergency Relief Program in Latah County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 231
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Latah County, Idaho totaled $10,435,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ridgeview Farms | Troy, ID 83871 | $415,044 |
2 | Thompson Farms | Moscow, ID 83843 | $409,301 |
3 | Kyle & Lisa Hawley | Moscow, ID 83843 | $248,398 |
4 | Pleasant Hill Farms | Troy, ID 83871 | $234,864 |
5 | Mark Thomas Dennler | Juliaetta, ID 83535 | $228,958 |
6 | K & L Farms Gp | Farmington, WA 99128 | $228,818 |
7 | Triple H Associates LLC | Moscow, ID 83843 | $224,422 |
8 | Agratech Forage Products LLC | Potlatch, ID 83855 | $224,395 |
9 | Boyd Farms Inc | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $223,835 |
10 | Moser Partners | Colton, WA 99113 | $217,195 |
11 | Esser Farms Gp | Moscow, ID 83843 | $206,588 |
12 | Nelson Brothers | Troy, ID 83871 | $185,834 |
13 | Kernson Corporation | Potlatch, ID 83855 | $183,935 |
14 | Littler Farm Inc | Troy, ID 83871 | $168,985 |
15 | James R Fredrickson | Troy, ID 83871 | $165,299 |
16 | Steven Wolheter | Potlatch, ID 83855 | $148,565 |
17 | Daniel Westacott Dba Cedar Creek Farms | Farmington, WA 99128 | $148,469 |
18 | Double Ridge Farms Inc | Kendrick, ID 83537 | $142,737 |
19 | G & C Growers Inc | Potlatch, ID 83855 | $139,271 |
20 | Driscoll Farms Inc | Troy, ID 83871 | $134,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>