Farm Subsidy information
Oneida County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Oneida County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 297
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $8,952,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gd Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $81,029 |
22 | Daniel R Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $76,015 |
23 | Crestview Farms Ag Partnership | Jackson, ID 83350 | $73,057 |
24 | North Valley Farms LLC | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $68,734 |
25 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $68,595 |
26 | Heritage Valley Farms LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $67,460 |
27 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $67,370 |
28 | Campbell Land LLC | Malta, ID 83342 | $66,888 |
29 | Robert Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $66,503 |
30 | Baxter Beef Inc | Corinne, UT 84307 | $63,510 |
31 | Tod Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $63,493 |
32 | Lookout Land & Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $58,184 |
33 | Buckhorn Ranching Co LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $57,848 |
34 | Douglas J Mills | Malad City, ID 83252 | $51,594 |
35 | Kay C Alder & Son Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $48,979 |
36 | Joe And Ann Jenson Revocable Trust | Arbon, ID 83212 | $48,811 |
37 | Kent And Pat Smith Livestock Co LLC | Malad, ID 83252 | $48,252 |
38 | Flying R Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $46,539 |
39 | Rb Ward Cattle Company LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $45,246 |
40 | Max King Family Farms Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $43,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”