Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Oneida County, Idaho, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 176
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $683,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $8,778 |
22 | Lookout Land & Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $8,562 |
23 | Russell K Boyer | Stone, ID 83252 | $8,488 |
24 | Hank T Higley | Malta, ID 83342 | $8,202 |
25 | Buckhorn Ranching Co LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $8,016 |
26 | John B Blaisdell | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,827 |
27 | Douglas J Mills | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,440 |
28 | Lynn A Wright | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,244 |
29 | Carter Ranch LLC | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $6,984 |
30 | Luke Andersen | Bear River City, UT 84301 | $6,944 |
31 | Lazy Eight Land And Livestock | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $6,906 |
32 | Rb Ward Cattle Company LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $6,832 |
33 | Bar Seventy Four Livestock, LLC | Stone, ID 83252 | $6,764 |
34 | Daniel R Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $6,616 |
35 | Royce Larsen | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $6,414 |
36 | Susan Wittman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $6,263 |
37 | Garth Josephson | Plymouth, UT 84330 | $6,262 |
38 | Steven G Smith | Lehi, UT 84043 | $5,825 |
39 | Ray D Sorensen & Sons Enterprises Inc | Howell, UT 84316 | $5,650 |
40 | Double D Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $5,648 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”