Production Flexibility Program in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 527
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $9,584,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John E Wittman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $100,883 |
22 | Jerry D Bush | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $100,690 |
23 | Flying R Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $100,085 |
24 | John Fredrickson Company | Evergreen, CO 80439 | $97,308 |
25 | Fuhriman Children Trust | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $95,199 |
26 | Steven Hess | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $91,531 |
27 | Davis Farm Limited | Malad City, ID 83252 | $89,441 |
28 | John B Blaisdell | Malad City, ID 83252 | $87,777 |
29 | Mark Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $86,818 |
30 | Bush Inc A & J | Malad City, ID 83252 | $82,339 |
31 | Larsen Land & Livestock | Arbon, ID 83212 | $82,279 |
32 | Howell Norman Family Trust | Garland, UT 84312 | $77,633 |
33 | George G Neal | Malad City, ID 83252 | $76,067 |
34 | J Thomas Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $75,802 |
35 | John C Hill | Malad City, ID 83252 | $74,438 |
36 | David R Harris | Malad City, ID 83252 | $72,331 |
37 | Joe And Ann Jenson Revocable Trust | Arbon, ID 83212 | $70,853 |
38 | Gary Parry | Malad City, ID 83252 | $70,114 |
39 | D Frank Tolman | Honeyville, UT 84314 | $68,618 |
40 | King Fmly Ptnrshp W Ronald & E L | Malad City, ID 83252 | $68,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”