Emergency Conservation Program in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 59 of 59
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $381,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Donald S Vaughan | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,900 |
42 | Steven J Timmerman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,892 |
43 | Larsen Land & Livestock | Arbon, ID 83212 | $1,707 |
44 | Robert H Evans | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,566 |
45 | Elden Nielsen Family Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,440 |
46 | W Brent Howard | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,179 |
47 | Kent D Smith | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,160 |
48 | Andrew Chad Bybee | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $970 |
49 | Kacey R Hill | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $918 |
50 | Klane Hill | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $918 |
51 | Curtis Hoskins | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $868 |
52 | G L Sam Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $742 |
53 | Wright Brothers Ranches L L C | Malad City, ID 83252 | $739 |
54 | Denton C John | Portage, UT 84331 | $648 |
55 | William Frank Hill | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $635 |
56 | Dean Blaisdell | Malad City, ID 83252 | $540 |
57 | Michael Jay Smith | Parachute, CO 81635 | $437 |
58 | Linda J John | Portage, UT 84331 | $432 |
59 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $71 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous