Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 166
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $858,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Wayne Clark | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,422 |
62 | Seven Farms LLC | Kamas, UT 84036 | $2,402 |
63 | Flying R Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,391 |
64 | Karl W Hill Jr | Stone, ID 83252 | $2,365 |
65 | Marilyn Showell | Stone, ID 83252 | $2,357 |
66 | Gale Neal | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,340 |
67 | Bonita Lee Howard | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,307 |
68 | Jeffrey C Bird | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $2,274 |
69 | John B Blaisdell | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,240 |
70 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $2,144 |
71 | David M Hill Farm | Ogden, UT 84403 | $2,081 |
72 | Lookout Land & Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $2,041 |
73 | Timothy D Keller | Stone, ID 83252 | $2,021 |
74 | Stevton Lvg Trst Stephen Werk Trustee | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,997 |
75 | Rodney Jenson | Sandy, UT 84092 | $1,991 |
76 | Park Family Trust Max & Noreen Park | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,983 |
77 | Blair Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,826 |
78 | Peterson Mark W & Aloa W Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,824 |
79 | Tallen K Boyer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,778 |
80 | Mark John | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”