Total Commodity Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,074
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $48,455,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Paul Hubbard Transport, Inc. | Malad City, ID 83252 | $209,549 |
62 | Lee And Evelyn Fuhriman Ltd Ptnrs | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $201,259 |
63 | Steve Criddle | Downey, ID 83234 | $200,882 |
64 | Howell Norman Family Trust | Garland, UT 84312 | $198,886 |
65 | Daniel R Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $197,157 |
66 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $194,757 |
67 | Sydney R Fuhriman | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $191,980 |
68 | Roy W Neal | Stone, ID 83252 | $186,906 |
69 | Kay C Alder & Son Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $186,852 |
70 | Davis Farm Limited | Malad City, ID 83252 | $185,917 |
71 | Mcbride Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $182,813 |
72 | Russell K Boyer | Stone, ID 83252 | $181,367 |
73 | Dredge & Son | Malad City, ID 83252 | $181,083 |
74 | Susan Wittman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $180,874 |
75 | J Thomas Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $178,899 |
76 | John Fredrickson Company | Evergreen, CO 80439 | $177,207 |
77 | David P Jones Jr | Malad City, ID 83252 | $175,558 |
78 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $172,809 |
79 | Danny T Hess | Malad City, ID 83252 | $171,571 |
80 | D Frank Tolman | Honeyville, UT 84314 | $171,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”