Conservation Reserve Program in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 704

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $63,362,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Bute Investment CompanyOgden, UT 84401$189,742
102D Eugene EdwardsMalad City, ID 83252$188,834
103Joseph J & Euarda N Daniels Living TrustMalad City, ID 83252$186,408
104Mcclellan A Ray & Sharon Family TMalad City, ID 83252$182,639
105D Parry JonesPocatello, ID 83204$182,245
106Howell Norman Family TrustGarland, UT 84312$180,780
107Tyler M SwartzMalad City, ID 83252$175,188
108John J Williams JrMalad City, ID 83252$174,873
109Davis Farm LimitedMalad City, ID 83252$174,872
110Tavoian Enterprises IncMalad City, ID 83252$171,601
111Jenson Brothers Ranch LLCSandy, UT 84092$170,541
112Goddard Tamara J TrustMalad City, ID 83252$168,108
113G Max King LLCMalad City, ID 83252$167,533
114Harrow Properties LLCTremonton, UT 84337$165,893
115Sharon-thorpe Rev Tr ThorpeMalad City, ID 83252$165,590
116Fuhriman Farms LLCMalad City, ID 83252$162,940
117Rose L EvansDowney, ID 83234$161,519
118Jenson Constance EstatePocatello, ID 83202$161,078
119South Norma W Family TrustBountiful, UT 84010$160,762
120Dee's IncSalt Lake City, UT 84106$157,867

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag