Total Disaster Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 607
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $16,462,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bush Inc A & J | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,548 |
142 | Justin David Edwards | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,420 |
143 | Pleasantview Livestock & Grazing | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,216 |
144 | Wilcock Ranch LLC | Snowville, UT 84336 | $30,126 |
145 | Dale L Harrison | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,007 |
146 | Leland Paul Gunnell | Malad City, ID 83252 | $29,831 |
147 | Ward Ryan And Barbara Family Trus | Malad City, ID 83252 | $29,826 |
148 | Lloyd Burt Miner | Plymouth, UT 84330 | $29,808 |
149 | Doyle C Waldron | Malad City, ID 83252 | $28,840 |
150 | Mcmurdie Cattle Co LLC | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $28,023 |
151 | George Love Construction | Layton, UT 84041 | $27,640 |
152 | Durbano Land & Cattle LLC | Ogden, UT 84402 | $27,383 |
153 | Sid Showell | Stone, ID 83252 | $26,923 |
154 | Ray Davis | Malad City, ID 83252 | $26,694 |
155 | David J Edwards | Malad City, ID 83252 | $26,621 |
156 | Linda J John | Portage, UT 84331 | $26,541 |
157 | Jenson Brothers Ranch LLC | Sandy, UT 84092 | $26,143 |
158 | Brett A Rose | Malad City, ID 83252 | $25,686 |
159 | George Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $25,682 |
160 | Paul Hubbard Transport, Inc. | Malad City, ID 83252 | $25,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”