Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Oneida County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 155
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $2,771,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S Bar S Ranch, LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $235,750 |
| 2 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $158,078 |
| 3 | Rocky Mountain Land & Cattle LLC | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $147,590 |
| 4 | Slash M Ranch Lc | Garland, UT 84312 | $116,493 |
| 5 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $112,546 |
| 6 | Hubbard Land & Lvstk | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $76,938 |
| 7 | Matthew D Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $74,457 |
| 8 | Potter Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $69,941 |
| 9 | R & V Neal Ranches Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $68,997 |
| 10 | Gd Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $57,770 |
| 11 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $49,753 |
| 12 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $48,814 |
| 13 | Baxter Beef Inc | Corinne, UT 84307 | $48,414 |
| 14 | Firth Brothers Cattle Company LLC | Malad, ID 83252 | $46,928 |
| 15 | Jeff E Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $45,822 |
| 16 | Buckhorn Ranching Co LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $43,838 |
| 17 | Tod Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $41,843 |
| 18 | Lookout Land & Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $39,198 |
| 19 | Carter Ranch LLC | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $36,197 |
| 20 | Garth Josephson | Plymouth, UT 84330 | $33,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
