Conservation Reserve Program in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 704
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $63,362,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steven J Timmerman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $990,804 |
2 | Park Family Trust Max & Noreen Park | Malad City, ID 83252 | $946,343 |
3 | Max King Family Farms Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $925,522 |
4 | Dale F Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $800,292 |
5 | Wright Bros Partnership | Malad City, ID 83252 | $744,337 |
6 | Robert Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $743,650 |
7 | Don S Evans | Malad City, ID 83252 | $725,207 |
8 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $685,577 |
9 | Wright Brothers Ranches L L C | Malad City, ID 83252 | $643,997 |
10 | Sid Clark | Malad City, ID 83252 | $638,260 |
11 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $626,007 |
12 | N D Or R Grover Partnership | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $587,574 |
13 | Elden Nielsen Family Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $579,555 |
14 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $571,812 |
15 | Denton C John | Portage, UT 84331 | $569,394 |
16 | Joe C Jenson | Arbon, ID 83212 | $561,556 |
17 | Lee Ann Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $540,217 |
18 | Donald S Vaughan | Malad City, ID 83252 | $530,530 |
19 | Robert L Perry | Logan, UT 84341 | $522,156 |
20 | Danny T Hess | Malad City, ID 83252 | $520,914 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>