Farm Subsidy information
Payette County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Payette County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 945
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Payette County, Idaho totaled $54,169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Donald H Liddell | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $65,331 |
142 | Christopher R Koehn | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $65,311 |
143 | Advantage Crossbreds LLC | Nampa, ID 83687 | $64,858 |
144 | Joseph W Levanger | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $63,137 |
145 | H-hook Ranch | Payette, ID 83661 | $63,035 |
146 | Howard Farms A Partnership | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $62,685 |
147 | Elizabeth Stephens Dba Little Val | Payette, ID 83661 | $62,633 |
148 | Walt Little Ranches | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $62,269 |
149 | Lettunich & Sons | Payette, ID 83661 | $60,834 |
150 | Edwin L Vande Voorde | Parma, ID 83660 | $60,504 |
151 | Rauert Orchards | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $60,083 |
152 | Matthew D Nauman | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $59,868 |
153 | Big Willow Ranch LLC | Payette, ID 83661 | $58,863 |
154 | Daniel Surmeier | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $58,828 |
155 | Daniel B Hansen | Nampa, ID 83687 | $58,686 |
156 | , | $58,156 | |
157 | John P Ziegler | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $57,537 |
158 | Ronald J Ray | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $56,743 |
159 | Chad A Henggeler | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $56,723 |
160 | Broken Sickle Farms Inc | Parma, ID 83660 | $56,429 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”