Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Power County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Power County, Idaho totaled $9,525,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Driscoll Brothers | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $1,182,144 |
2 | Gehring Agri-business | American Falls, ID 83211 | $1,065,725 |
3 | Koompin Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $704,492 |
4 | Behrend Behrend & Knittel Farms | Aberdeen, ID 83210 | $602,152 |
5 | Monty & Carolene Funk Partnership | American Falls, ID 83211 | $389,712 |
6 | Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $334,900 |
7 | Ruff Times Farms | Aberdeen, ID 83210 | $329,633 |
8 | Diamond K Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $316,118 |
9 | Kendell Farms General Partnership | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $215,992 |
10 | K-k Enterprises | American Falls, ID 83211 | $192,336 |
11 | Tyson Funk | American Falls, ID 83211 | $189,198 |
12 | Legacy Agro Business Dba Legacy F | American Falls, ID 83211 | $187,280 |
13 | Grant Neibaur & Sons | American Falls, ID 83211 | $174,712 |
14 | Tina Clinger | American Falls, ID 83211 | $174,150 |
15 | David & Doug Neibaur Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $168,908 |
16 | Jerome Clinger | American Falls, ID 83211 | $164,538 |
17 | Will Rowe | American Falls, ID 83211 | $137,761 |
18 | Ana I Rowe | American Falls, ID 83211 | $137,761 |
19 | Tanner Funk | American Falls, ID 83211 | $124,556 |
20 | Keltsi Funk | American Falls, ID 83211 | $124,556 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>