Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Twin Falls County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Twin Falls County, Idaho totaled $4,162,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Noh Sheep Company | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $411,556 |
2 | Salmon Falls Land And Livestock Co Inc | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $399,759 |
3 | Guerry Inc | Castleford, ID 83321 | $385,481 |
4 | W T Williams Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $304,458 |
5 | Duelke Sheep Co LLC | Buhl, ID 83316 | $232,331 |
6 | C & L Ranch LLC | Ashton, ID 83420 | $213,056 |
7 | J R Jim Baker | Filer, ID 83328 | $206,737 |
8 | Gregg Hall | Filer, ID 83328 | $151,182 |
9 | , | $120,055 | |
10 | Point Ranch Cattle Co Inc | Rogerson, ID 83302 | $120,043 |
11 | Josh Williamson | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $110,998 |
12 | Foothill Land & Livestock LLC | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $103,162 |
13 | Mathers Ranch Inc | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $98,703 |
14 | N Ranch LLC | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $88,555 |
15 | Koch Land & Livestock LLC | Filer, ID 83328 | $75,928 |
16 | Alex Kunkel | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $64,191 |
17 | Williams Properties LLC | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $62,197 |
18 | Kasel Land And Livestock Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83303 | $61,495 |
19 | Norma Jean Brown | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $60,624 |
20 | Thomas A Williams | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $58,570 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>