Total Conservation Programs in Illinois, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41,963
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Illinois totaled $175,843,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $62,476 | |
22 | Richard Kennay | Ashton, IL 61006 | $61,426 |
23 | Gordon M Pointer | Kewanee, IL 61443 | $60,660 |
24 | Karen Divjak Johnson Rev Liv Trust | Springfield, IL 62708 | $60,531 |
25 | Gary Quandt Trust | Iuka, IL 62849 | $60,483 |
26 | Nelson Family Trust | Lanark, IL 61046 | $60,306 |
27 | John Pat Williams-john Patrick Williams Trust U/a | Enfield, IL 62835 | $59,441 |
28 | Francis U Ballegeer Trust | Geneseo, IL 61254 | $59,196 |
29 | John P Maginel-john Paul Maginel And Paige Helm Ma | Dongola, IL 62926 | $58,654 |
30 | Fred L Scott | Bluford, IL 62814 | $58,643 |
31 | Ma Peifer Farms LLC | Nokomis, IL 62075 | $57,233 |
32 | Stoddard Partners | Monticello, IL 61856 | $56,557 |
33 | Jbaa General Partnership | Leland, IL 60531 | $56,256 |
34 | Hartney Brothers | Seneca, SC 29672 | $56,168 |
35 | Terra Link | Edgewood, IL 62426 | $55,944 |
36 | Steven A Hutmacher | Teutopolis, IL 62467 | $55,512 |
37 | Jenks Family Farms | Monmouth, IL 61462 | $54,970 |
38 | Allen Stichter | Erie, IL 61250 | $54,346 |
39 | Terrance L Johnson Revocable Trust | Springfield, IL 62708 | $54,154 |
40 | Gordon Bauer | Topeka, IL 61567 | $53,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”