Conservation Reserve Program in Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 119,045
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Illinois totaled $3,603,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Freeman Farms Ltd | Bluffs, IL 62621 | $646,656 |
202 | Smith Farms | St Peters, MO 63304 | $646,338 |
203 | Sdm Carls Inc | Beardstown, IL 62618 | $646,081 |
204 | Jeffrey Kamrath | Forrest, IL 61741 | $645,081 |
205 | Ralph Sherman | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $643,937 |
206 | Honey Point Duck Club Inc | Springfield, IL 62712 | $642,669 |
207 | Allen Wilson | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $642,006 |
208 | Don Friend | Bath, IL 62617 | $641,512 |
209 | Green-wing Teal Habitat Foundatio | Chicago, IL 60604 | $639,567 |
210 | Joe-esther Revocable Esther | Rushville, IL 62681 | $638,454 |
211 | Stuart Farms Inc | Roodhouse, IL 62082 | $637,395 |
212 | Waggener Land Co Inc | Atlanta, GA 63834 | $637,083 |
213 | Wood Duck Habitat Foundation | Chicago, IL 60604 | $636,996 |
214 | Five Bar Farms | Wayne City, IL 62895 | $635,742 |
215 | Patrick Schwartz | Johnsonville, IL 62850 | $635,160 |
216 | Michael L Vanhyning | La Grange, WY 82221 | $633,866 |
217 | Steve Sempos | Saybrook, IL 61770 | $633,097 |
218 | Carolyn S Finfrock | Waynesville, IL 61778 | $631,938 |
219 | Philip St John | Wyoming, IL 61491 | $631,266 |
220 | Gary Kent Wilkerson Estate | Versailles, IL 62378 | $630,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”