Counter Cyclical Program in Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 119,589
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Illinois totaled $846,305,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Plunk Brothers Ptr | Mansfield, IL 61854 | $153,544 |
62 | Baker Farms | London Mills, IL 61544 | $153,380 |
63 | Lorenzen Farms Ptrp | Chrisman, IL 61924 | $153,003 |
64 | Kent Family Farm Partnership | Winslow, IL 61089 | $150,780 |
65 | Biddle Brothers | Elburn, IL 60119 | $149,640 |
66 | T O Logsdon Farms Partnership | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $149,103 |
67 | Thacker Farms | Walnut, IL 61376 | $147,580 |
68 | Hornstein Farms | Melvin, IL 60952 | $147,274 |
69 | Valley View Farm | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $147,261 |
70 | Crane Farms | Forrest, IL 61741 | $144,048 |
71 | Hetz Farms Partnership | Cordova, IL 61242 | $143,704 |
72 | Ivers Bros | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $143,594 |
73 | Eric And Kyle Kraft Dba Spoon River Valley Farms | Princeville, IL 61559 | $143,546 |
74 | Ohl Brothers Partnership | Danville, IL 61834 | $139,874 |
75 | Curry Family Farm | Alpha, IL 61413 | $139,765 |
76 | Fink Tom And Lisa Joint Venture | Chadwick, IL 61014 | $139,494 |
77 | Marilyn Shriver & Sons Lp | Ursa, IL 62376 | $138,708 |
78 | Thomas Ron Larry Dowson | Auburn, IL 62615 | $137,496 |
79 | W W Farms | Ridge Farm, IL 61870 | $136,622 |
80 | J & J Farms Partnership | Milledgeville, IL 61051 | $136,390 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”