Conservation Reserve Program in Illinois, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 41,950
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Illinois totaled $175,807,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bernard G Darr | Jerseyville, IL 62052 | $50,000 |
62 | Roger C Franck | Aledo, IL 61231 | $50,000 |
63 | Richard Miller | Plymouth, IL 62367 | $50,000 |
64 | Roettger Electric Co Inc | Evansville, IN 47725 | $50,000 |
65 | Sheila Abbott | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $50,000 |
66 | David Olson | Seaton, IL 61476 | $50,000 |
67 | Bushue Corporation | Mason, IL 62443 | $50,000 |
68 | Vermilion County Conservation Foundation | Danville, IL 61834 | $50,000 |
69 | Wernsing Farms Inc | Raymond, IL 62560 | $50,000 |
70 | Lisa Lanette Lawrence | Elaine, AR 72333 | $50,000 |
71 | Deer Hollow Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $50,000 |
72 | Cherie C Higgins | Burlington, IA 52601 | $50,000 |
73 | Hart Family Partnership LLC | Streator, IL 61364 | $50,000 |
74 | Fllz LLC | Washington, IL 61571 | $50,000 |
75 | Thomas M Matheson | Chicago, IL 60631 | $50,000 |
76 | Carolyn J Matheson | Chicago, IL 60631 | $50,000 |
77 | Shawn White | Decatur, TX 76234 | $50,000 |
78 | Marjorie Satterthwaite Trust | Jacksonville, IL 62651 | $50,000 |
79 | Dorothea Yeck Trust | Jacksonville, IL 62651 | $50,000 |
80 | Prairie Hills Resource Conservation & Development | Macomb, IL 61455 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”